What’s Wrong with Starlink’s Direct-to-Cell Service?

What’s Wrong with Starlink’s Direct-to-Cell Service?

SpaceX’s Starlink has launched a revolutionary direct-to-cell satellite communication service that enables smartphones to connect directly to satellites, eliminating the need for traditional cell towers and addressing connectivity issues in dead zones worldwide. This new technology promises seamless communication, allowing users to make calls, send texts, and eventually access data services without requiring specialized hardware or applications. Collaborating with major telecommunications companies, Starlink aims to enhance global connectivity and support Internet of Things (IoT) devices in areas lacking terrestrial coverage.

Editor’s Note: While Starlink’s direct-to-cell service promises to enhance global connectivity, it also raises important health concerns that merit attention. The proliferation of satellite communications could increase radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure, particularly in densely populated areas where devices are constantly in contact with satellites. Although regulatory bodies like the FCC set safety limits for RF exposure, the long-term health effects of chronic exposure remain uncertain. [To know more about the dangers of electromagnetic fields or EMF like 5G and other cell signals, read Landmark 5G study highlights its threats to health, We have no reason to believe that 5G is safe, 5g is for robots, not humans, Stopping 5G is more important than controlling it, Is 5G a public health issue?, Harm due to 5G appears in Swiss magazine, 5G violates human rights and environmental law, Scientists appeal to WHO: 5G should be considered group 1 carcinogen, Brussels halted 5G plan due to its health effects, 5G uses nearly same frequency as weaponized crowd control, 5G is a threat to all life on earth, The Health Risks of 5G].

Read Original Article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *