Are science and spirit really incompatible?
Physicist Alan Lightman calls himself a spiritual atheist. He was a pure materialist before but
Quantum Physics
Why materialism cannot explain consciousness
Because we are unable to define what matter is, a materialist explanation of consciousness is untenable.
Quantum mechanics shows us that the universe has a purpose
This new experiment shows us that researchers cannot determine for certain whether the action of an entangled particle is a cause or an effect.
David Bohm and Rupert Sheldrake on morphic fields and the implicate order
David Bohm and Rupert Sheldrake both have theories about the morphogenetic field. In this conversation, they enhance each other’s theories by clarifying their assumptions and sharing their unique ideas.
Lessons from the Global Consciousness Project
The Global Consciousness Project is proof of the great wisdom of humanity. It shows us that when our hearts and minds are united towards one goal, we will be able to transform this universe.
Does objective reality exist?
A new experiment shows us that quantum observers are entitled to their own facts. The truth for one may change for the other.
The search for proof of the string theory
Why are scientists ready to accept the string theory despite its lack of evidence but they remain skeptical of the post-materialist sciences?
How each individual can help transform “the field”
Our thoughts, attitudes, and emotions emit energetic fields. If your day feels that everything is going wrong, it is becaus you are creating a negative field environment. This article will help you transform your day so that it ends better than it started.
Recontextualizing the “hard problem” of consciousness
Which science do you believe in: the one that says we have discovered all that we can know about physical reality, or the other that says we can never really understand the deep nature of reality? Is there a middle ground?
Making sense of the mental universe
The universal mind is the basis of all reality. Read this article to understand the depth of this assertion.