Neural science cannot save materialist science
Science is showing, neuronal activity does not create consciousness. How then can neural networks save materialist science from obsolescence?
Science is showing, neuronal activity does not create consciousness. How then can neural networks save materialist science from obsolescence?
Research shows that consciousness cannot simply be attributed to the brain’s neuronal activity.
Scientists must only try to answer questions which are within the bounds of science, not questions of origin or metaphysics.
AI is nothing more than sophisticated math, says Joe McKendrick.
Our exploration of space and the quest to create AI are but manifestations of a much deeper desire to understand who we are and what our purpose is in the universe.
There is no new physics that an be developed that will restore classical physics as a basis for reality. What does it mean for us?
In this article published by Inverse Magazine, writer Emma Betuel echoes the theory of researchers Steven Salzerg and Rachel Sherman that using a single reference genome for genetic studies does not capture the diversity of human genetics.
This article for Patheos by Bruce Baker adds a new layer to the consciousness debate. Baker discusses three myths in the article to prove that AI can never be truly understand what ethics is about.